TMFM vs. FTGC
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 2.90%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for FTGC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
TMFM vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -10.13% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 16.89% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -12.40%
- 1Y
- -20.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
TMFM vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -10.13% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 1.91% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.89% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and FTGC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between TMFM and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
FTGC
TMFM vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.33 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 2.31 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 9.40 | -10.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -59.47% | +27.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -12.34% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -12.34% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.87% | -12.34% | -14.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -27.33% | +11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.53% | 3.02% | +12.51% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 3.33%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 3.33% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 13.32% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 15.64% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 15.89% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 14.72% | +5.86% |
TMFM vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FTGC's 16.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.40% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and FTGC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFM has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to FTGC (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 3-year performance, FTGC leads with 13.63% vs 2.90% for TMFM. On fees, TMFM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 2.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer