TMFM vs. DBO
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. TMFM is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 1.83%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for DBO. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
TMFM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
DBO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 24.59%
- 6M
- 53.46%
- YTD
- 76.48%
- 1Y
- 60.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.01M | $10.23M | $13.95M | |
| $157.21K | $169.51K | $230.30K |
TMFM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.79% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 1.91% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 76.48% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and DBO is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.00 |
The correlation between TMFM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
DBO
TMFM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.25 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.01 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 6.09 | -7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -90.18% | +58.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -27.73% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -28.20% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.34% | -53.56% | +30.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -62.20% | +46.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 9.96% | +4.55% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is 6.01%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that TMFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 17.75% | -11.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 33.77% | -17.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 38.53% | -18.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 33.35% | -12.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 32.20% | -11.60% |
TMFM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than DBO's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.99% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to TMFM (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.86% vs 1.83% for TMFM. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TMFM has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer