TMFG vs. WBIG
TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFG returned 12.53%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for WBIG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for WBIG.
Performance
TMFG vs. WBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than WBIG's 8.66% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
TMFG vs. WBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 1.99% | 6.75% | 15.45% | 28.36% | -28.17% | 1.21% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 8.66% | -0.39% | 5.87% | -2.68% | -7.68% | 2.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and WBIG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TMFG and WBIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. WBIG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
WBIG
TMFG vs. WBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFG | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 3.88 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 12.22 | -11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFG | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.99 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.15 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. WBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than WBIG's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and WBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -25.32% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -5.06% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -20.20% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -4.84% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -10.92% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.61% | +1.87% |
Volatility
TMFG vs. WBIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 2.64%, while WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WBIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 3.43% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 6.58% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 9.89% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 12.05% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 11.55% | +7.05% |
TMFG vs. WBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIG's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFG vs. WBIG - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than WBIG's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.21% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFG and WBIG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WBIG has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to TMFG (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs WBIG's -25.32%.
On 3-year performance, TMFG leads with 12.53% vs 6.22% for WBIG. On fees, TMFG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMFG has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFG and WBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer