PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFG vs. SHEH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFG vs. SHEH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than SHEH's 25.14% return.


TMFG

1D
1.85%
1M
2.53%
6M
5.07%
YTD
5.76%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.47%

SHEH

1D
-0.63%
1M
15.58%
6M
23.06%
YTD
25.14%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$782.03K$668.74K$325.26K
$305.59K$359.54K$429.54K

TMFG vs. SHEH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
5.76%10.27%
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
25.14%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and SHEH is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.12

TMFG vs. SHEH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFG
SHEH

Industrials

23.9%

-

Financial Services

17.9%

-

Communication Services

13.0%

-

Technology

12.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Real Estate

8.1%

-

Healthcare

6.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Energy

-

96.5%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

TMFG
23.9%
SHEH

-

Financial Services

TMFG
17.9%
SHEH

-

Communication Services

TMFG
13.0%
SHEH

-

Technology

TMFG
12.4%
SHEH

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMFG
10.7%
SHEH

-

Real Estate

TMFG
8.1%
SHEH

-

Healthcare

TMFG
6.6%
SHEH

-

Consumer Defensive

TMFG
5.4%
SHEH

-

Basic Materials

TMFG
2.1%
SHEH

-

Energy

TMFG

-

SHEH
96.5%

Utilities

TMFG

-

SHEH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFG vs. SHEH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG
TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEH
SHEH Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SHEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. SHEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFGSHEHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.59

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

4.35

-2.02

TMFG vs. SHEH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the SHEH Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and SHEH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. SHEH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than SHEH's maximum drawdown of -17.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and SHEH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFGSHEHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-17.53%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-17.53%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.52%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-4.14%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

6.41%

-2.91%

Volatility

TMFG vs. SHEH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.92%, while Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHEH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFGSHEHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

6.85%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

17.33%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

21.00%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

20.53%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

20.53%

-2.08%

TMFG vs. SHEH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SHEH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFG vs. SHEH - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SHEH's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.27%13.94%5.42%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFG and SHEH have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHEH has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to TMFG (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs SHEH's -17.53%.

On 1-year performance, SHEH leads with 27.83% vs 8.13% for TMFG. On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SHEH has performed better with a 27.83% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

SHEH has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while SHEH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.19% for SHEH.

SHEH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFG and SHEH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer