TMFG vs. BOAT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while BOAT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index. TMFG is actively managed, while BOAT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFG returned 12.52%/yr vs 26.95%/yr for BOAT. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.

Performance

TMFG vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 45.07% return.

TMFG

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 2.53%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 1Y: 8.13%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

BOAT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 13.47%
• 6M: 27.28%
• YTD: 45.07%
• 1Y: 59.66%
• 3Y*: 26.95%
• 5Y*: 25.20%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	$1.71M	$1.08M	$1.06M
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	$305.59K	$359.54K	$429.54K

TMFG vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	5.76%	6.75%	15.45%	28.36%	-28.17%	1.91%
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	45.07%	22.77%	5.97%	24.53%	6.26%	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and BOAT is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021	0.38

TMFG vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFG	BOAT
Industrials	23.9%	29.2%
Financial Services	17.9%	6.6%
Communication Services	13.0%	-
Technology	12.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Real Estate	8.1%	-
Healthcare	6.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Energy	-	10.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TMFG vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 25
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BOAT

BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 93
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFG vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFG	BOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	2.90	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	3.75	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.46	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	5.17	-4.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.33	14.58	-12.26

TMFG vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and BOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFG	BOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-33.94%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-11.60%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	-33.94%	+17.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.54%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	-9.51%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	4.10%	-0.60%

Volatility

TMFG vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.92%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFG	BOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	6.64%	-2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	16.86%	-6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	20.72%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	25.06%	-6.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	25.06%	-6.61%

TMFG vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFG vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than BOAT's 6.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	6.34%	8.08%	13.89%	13.65%	13.57%	1.36%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.26%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFG and BOAT in my portfolio?

TMFG and BOAT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFG or BOAT?

BOAT has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to TMFG (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

Which ETF is better, TMFG or BOAT?

On 3-year performance, BOAT leads with 26.95% vs 12.52% for TMFG. On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFG or BOAT?

Over the 3-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 26.95% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFG or BOAT?

BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFG or BOAT?

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.

What is the main difference between TMFG and BOAT?

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.69% for BOAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.