TMED vs. VHT
TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMED charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
TMED vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMED achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.02% return.
TMED
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VHT
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
TMED vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 3.87% | 18.92% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -4.02% | 16.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMED and VHT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMED vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
TMED
VHT
TMED vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMED | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.56 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
TMED vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMED | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -39.12% | +28.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -7.05% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -5.99% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility
TMED vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMED | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 14.34% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 14.96% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.94% | +1.10% |
TMED vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMED vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
TMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VHT's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.71% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TMED and VHT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.52% for TMED.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.09% for VHT.
Find the right allocation for TMED and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer