TMDIX vs. YACKX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX).
TMDIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992.
Performance
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | -10.97% | -1.76% | 10.84% | 25.07% | -22.26% | 16.75% | 33.42% | 63.26% | -4.28% | 22.66% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 4.19% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDIX achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 4.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TMDIX having a 11.64% annualized return and YACKX not far behind at 11.21%.
TMDIX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -9.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMDIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
TMDIX
YACKX
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 0.20 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | 0.35 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.18 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 0.55 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 0.20 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDIX and YACKX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
Neither TMDIX nor YACKX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.08% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 29.72% | 18.28% | 31.06% | 16.38% | 14.44% | 5.90% | 7.73% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, roughly equal to the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and YACKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.73% | -46.65% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -16.30% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.53% | -19.86% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.44% | -30.93% | -4.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.45% | -10.67% | -14.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -5.28% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 5.46% | +4.31% |
Volatility
TMDIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 4.89%. This indicates that TMDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMDIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 4.89% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.89% | 19.24% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 21.08% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 17.02% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 16.09% | +4.90% |