PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDIX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDIX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than ARSMX's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TMDIX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.18% annualized return.


TMDIX

1D
2.45%
1M
-3.41%
6M
5.22%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
-6.10%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
10.91%

ARSMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
2.53%
6M
8.11%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.18%
ALL TIME*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.53%-1.76%10.84%25.07%-22.26%16.75%33.42%63.26%-4.28%22.66%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
10.49%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDIX and ARSMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between TMDIX and ARSMX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMDIX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMDIX
TMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMDIXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.10

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

0.71

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

1.64

-2.25

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDIX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, smaller than the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDIXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-51.75%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.45%

-10.37%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-19.34%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.53%

-19.34%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.44%

-42.96%

+7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

-1.59%

-10.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-8.06%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.95%

4.47%

+8.48%

Volatility

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 4.05%. This indicates that TMDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMDIXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.05%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

9.15%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.64%

14.41%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

17.71%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

19.51%

+1.60%

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMDIX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMDIX nor ARSMX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%8.08%3.98%3.69%29.72%18.28%31.06%16.38%14.44%5.90%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMDIX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMDIX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to ARSMX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDIX dropped -48.73% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

ARSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMDIX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer