PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMCPX vs. TEQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) and Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCPX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than TEQAX's 13.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TMCPX has underperformed TEQAX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while TEQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


TMCPX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.52%
YTD
-2.01%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
10.61%

TEQAX

1D
0.67%
1M
7.77%
YTD
13.13%
6M
14.24%
1Y
26.24%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMCPX
Touchstone Mid Cap Fund
-2.01%4.87%8.48%27.48%-15.62%15.21%12.56%39.44%-3.14%20.23%
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
13.13%29.86%8.94%23.45%-17.07%11.86%14.44%23.18%-9.72%25.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCPX and TEQAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2003

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between TMCPX and TEQAX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMCPX vs. TEQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMCPX
TMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQAX
TEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) and Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMCPXTEQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.28

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.25

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

8.44

-7.24

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the TEQAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCPX and TEQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMCPXTEQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.59

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.57

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Drawdowns

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCPX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, smaller than the maximum TEQAX drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCPX and TEQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCPXTEQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-61.14%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-11.23%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-14.29%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-35.95%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

-35.95%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

0.00%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-17.80%

+8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

2.99%

+1.93%

Volatility

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) and Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCPXTEQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.25%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

13.12%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

15.99%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

18.55%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

18.17%

+0.33%

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than TEQAX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMCPX vs. TEQAX - Dividend Comparison

TMCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than TEQAX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
3.89%4.40%3.51%1.46%7.21%12.19%0.33%3.80%10.50%13.02%0.55%51.95%
TMCPX
Touchstone Mid Cap Fund
2.25%2.20%2.52%0.92%1.43%2.80%1.93%5.18%3.95%1.10%0.58%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMCPX and TEQAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEQAX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to TMCPX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCPX dropped -58.03% vs TEQAX's -61.14%.

TEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMCPX and TEQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer