TMCPX vs. VUG
TMCPX (Touchstone Mid Cap Fund) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both funds - TMCPX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Touchstone, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, TMCPX returned 10.97%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMCPX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
TMCPX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMCPX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TMCPX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 10.97%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.
TMCPX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
VUG
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
TMCPX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | 1.66% | 4.87% | 8.48% | 27.48% | -15.62% | 15.21% | 12.56% | 39.44% | -3.14% | 20.23% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.76% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMCPX and VUG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMCPX and VUG has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMCPX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
TMCPX
VUG
TMCPX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMCPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.46 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 4.99 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMCPX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMCPX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCPX and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMCPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -50.68% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -16.53% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -22.85% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -35.61% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.54% | -35.61% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -4.86% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -7.09% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 4.82% | +0.29% |
Volatility
TMCPX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) is 5.20%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that TMCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMCPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 6.55% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.26% | 13.32% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 16.80% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 22.36% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 21.53% | -2.99% |
TMCPX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMCPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMCPX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
TMCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | 2.17% | 2.20% | 2.52% | 0.92% | 1.43% | 2.80% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 3.95% | 1.10% | 0.58% | 0.06% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMCPX and VUG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to TMCPX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCPX dropped -58.03% vs VUG's -50.68%.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMCPX and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer