TMCIX vs. SGFFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TMCIX (RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund) and SGFFX (Sparrow Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TMCIX returned 9.27%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for SGFFX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMCIX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for SGFFX.

Performance

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCIX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than SGFFX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TMCIX has underperformed SGFFX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while SGFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.18% annualized return.

TMCIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

SGFFX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 13.93%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 16.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund	0.07%	-0.79%	6.78%	17.32%	-16.59%	23.50%	20.52%	33.98%	-4.58%	17.07%
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund	4.05%	14.31%	34.81%	17.02%	-23.36%	-11.00%	97.83%	27.24%	6.26%	31.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCIX and SGFFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between TMCIX and SGFFX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TMCIX vs. SGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMCIX

TMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
TMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SGFFX

SGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 13
SGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMCIX	SGFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.13	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	1.64	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.20	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	0.99	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.68	3.30	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCIX and SGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMCIX	SGFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.13	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.26	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.58	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.29	-0.02

Drawdowns

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCIX drawdown since its inception was -57.70%, smaller than the maximum SGFFX drawdown of -62.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCIX and SGFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMCIX	SGFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.70%	-62.10%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-15.33%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.64%	-39.29%	+13.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	-40.24%	+14.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.34%	-50.45%	+13.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-15.48%	+8.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.57%	-22.17%	+5.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	4.58%	+0.18%

Volatility

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Volatility Comparison

RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) at 2.52%. This indicates that TMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMCIX	SGFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	2.52%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	9.87%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.48%	12.95%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.17%	27.12%	-6.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	27.98%	-7.22%

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCIX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than SGFFX's 1.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMCIX vs. SGFFX - Dividend Comparison

TMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, while SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	18.67%	0.00%	0.67%	1.33%	5.84%	7.33%	0.00%	2.59%
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund	7.77%	7.78%	1.32%	2.04%	7.82%	24.68%	2.63%	7.32%	9.26%	22.57%	7.25%	11.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMCIX and SGFFX in my portfolio?

TMCIX and SGFFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMCIX or SGFFX?

TMCIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to SGFFX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCIX dropped -57.70% vs SGFFX's -62.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.