PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMCIX vs. PKSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCIX achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than PKSFX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TMCIX has underperformed PKSFX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while PKSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.


TMCIX

1D
0.63%
1M
1.07%
6M
5.04%
YTD
8.16%
1Y
12.98%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
5.95%

PKSFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.87%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
7.13%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
15.13%
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMCIX
RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund
8.16%-0.79%6.78%17.32%-16.59%23.50%20.52%33.98%-4.58%17.07%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
7.13%-2.58%13.67%32.32%-10.77%19.03%21.38%40.21%-1.99%34.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCIX and PKSFX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1996

0.88

The correlation between TMCIX and PKSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMCIX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMCIX
TMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PKSFX
PKSFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PKSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PKSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMCIXPKSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

0.41

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

0.82

+1.69

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the PKSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCIX and PKSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCIX drawdown since its inception was -57.70%, which is greater than PKSFX's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCIX and PKSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCIXPKSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.70%

-54.46%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-11.19%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.64%

-21.82%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-22.02%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.34%

-33.45%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.43%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-7.15%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

5.62%

-0.66%

Volatility

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) is 3.70%, while Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that TMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCIXPKSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.20%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

11.00%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

15.68%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

17.99%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.80%

+1.93%

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCIX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMCIX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison

TMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than PKSFX's 13.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
13.35%14.30%4.07%4.12%6.65%12.05%7.45%4.03%4.33%0.17%5.69%19.83%
TMCIX
RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund
7.19%7.78%1.32%2.04%7.82%24.68%2.63%7.32%9.26%22.57%7.25%11.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMCIX and PKSFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKSFX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to TMCIX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCIX dropped -57.70% vs PKSFX's -54.46%.

TMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMCIX and PKSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer