PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMCGX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCGX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than SSMHX's 13.05% return.


TMCGX

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.81%
YTD
9.82%
6M
6.68%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*

SSMHX

1D
-0.99%
1M
3.42%
YTD
13.05%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TMCGX
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund
9.82%2.48%10.20%16.94%-28.27%11.39%53.73%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
13.05%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%44.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCGX and SSMHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.94

The correlation between TMCGX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMCGX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMCGX
TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMCGXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.87

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

10.43

-7.15

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCGX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMCGXSSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.71

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.27

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.47

-0.07

Drawdowns

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SSMHX drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCGX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCGXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.66%

-41.61%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.58%

-10.03%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.28%

-30.38%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.66%

-34.84%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-0.99%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-9.14%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

2.76%

+1.66%

Volatility

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) is 4.03%, while State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that TMCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCGXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.82%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

12.37%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

16.94%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

22.41%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.18%

22.39%

+1.79%

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMCGX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.30%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%
TMCGX
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.13%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TMCGX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSMHX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to TMCGX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCGX dropped -39.66% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMCGX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer