TMCGX vs. MEIIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMCGX (Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MEIIX (MFS Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - TMCGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while MEIIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, TMCGX returned 2.36%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for MEIIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMCGX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MEIIX.

Performance

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCGX achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than MEIIX's 6.49% return.

TMCGX

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 9.65%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: —

MEIIX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 5.75%
• 1Y: 15.99%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 10.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.86%	2.48%	10.20%	16.94%	-28.27%	11.39%	53.73%
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	6.49%	13.26%	11.86%	8.21%	-6.02%	25.43%	14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCGX and MEIIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.71

The correlation between TMCGX and MEIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMCGX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMCGX

TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MEIIX

MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 36
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMCGX	MEIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.52	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.21	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.27	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	2.39	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.57	8.24	-4.67

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the MEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCGX and MEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCGX and MEIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMCGX	MEIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.66%	-52.64%	+12.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.58%	-6.76%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.28%	-13.19%	-12.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.66%	-17.58%	-22.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-1.42%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-6.54%	-9.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	1.96%	+2.48%

Volatility

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 3.21%. This indicates that TMCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMCGX	MEIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.26%	3.21%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.58%	7.88%	+6.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.73%	10.64%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.36%	13.94%	+8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.19%	16.57%	+7.62%

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMCGX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I	9.13%	9.52%	9.30%	8.41%	7.58%	3.32%	2.63%	3.17%	3.62%	4.04%	2.91%	5.97%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.13%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMCGX and MEIIX in my portfolio?

TMCGX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMCGX or MEIIX?

TMCGX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to MEIIX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCGX dropped -39.66% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.