PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMCGX vs. AAINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund (AAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCGX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than AAINX's 0.90% return.


TMCGX

1D
2.08%
1M
-1.71%
6M
9.23%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.32%

AAINX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.98%
6M
0.30%
YTD
0.90%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
2.75%
ALL TIME*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TMCGX
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund
9.23%2.48%10.20%16.94%-28.27%11.39%53.73%
AAINX
Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund
0.90%7.82%4.90%7.77%-10.57%1.47%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCGX and AAINX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

0.43

The correlation between TMCGX and AAINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMCGX vs. AAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMCGX
TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AAINX
AAINX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund (AAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMCGXAAINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.94

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

8.11

-6.57

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the AAINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCGX and AAINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, which is greater than AAINX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCGX and AAINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCGXAAINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.66%

-15.72%

-23.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.58%

-2.46%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.28%

-3.60%

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.66%

-14.18%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-1.08%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-1.86%

-13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

0.59%

+3.91%

Volatility

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund (AAINX) at 0.66%. This indicates that TMCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCGXAAINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

0.66%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

2.36%

+12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

2.79%

+15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

4.03%

+18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

3.89%

+20.17%

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AAINX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMCGX vs. AAINX - Dividend Comparison

TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAINX
Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund
4.29%4.62%4.78%3.88%4.00%2.74%2.99%3.76%4.04%3.28%3.55%3.88%
TMCGX
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.13%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMCGX and AAINX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMCGX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to AAINX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCGX dropped -39.66% vs AAINX's -15.72%.

AAINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMCGX and AAINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer