PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMC vs. MKA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMC vs. MKA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TMC is traded in USD, while MKA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MKA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMC achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than MKA.L's -8.16% return.


TMC

1D
5.85%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-11.99%
6M
-18.22%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
68.25%
5Y*
10Y*

MKA.L

1D
1.98%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-17.32%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
60.60%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMC vs. MKA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-11.99%450.89%1.82%42.86%-62.98%-81.18%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-8.16%529.04%-32.02%-1.17%-64.71%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TMC and MKA.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMC:

$1.75T

MKA.L:

£149.39M

EPS

TMC:

-$0.00

MKA.L:

-$0.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMC:

$0.00

MKA.L:

$50.78K

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMC:

-$136.00K

MKA.L:

-$544.15K

EBITDA (TTM)

TMC:

-$296.72M

MKA.L:

-$17.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMC vs. MKA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMC vs. MKA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMCMKA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

3.00

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

6.16

-5.82

TMC vs. MKA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the MKA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMC and MKA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMC vs. MKA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMC drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than MKA.L's maximum drawdown of -89.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMC and MKA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCMKA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.58%

-89.22%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.65%

-51.55%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.56%

-66.46%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.39%

-37.46%

-18.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.43%

-45.43%

-34.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.93%

25.19%

+12.74%

Volatility

TMC vs. MKA.L - Volatility Comparison

TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a higher volatility of 24.27% compared to Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) at 22.41%. This indicates that TMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCMKA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.27%

22.41%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.29%

48.66%

+19.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.72%

94.99%

+9.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.21%

77.90%

+35.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.21%

96.82%

+16.39%

Dividends

TMC vs. MKA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMC nor MKA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMC vs. MKA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TMC the metals company Inc. and Mkango Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00K20.00K30.00K40.00K50.00K202220232024202520260
50.78K
(TMC) Total Revenue
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TMC and MKA.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMC and MKA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer