PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMC vs. ARRNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMC vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMC achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than ARRNF's 28.10% return.


TMC

1D
5.85%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-11.99%
6M
-18.22%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
68.25%
5Y*
10Y*

ARRNF

1D
2.32%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
28.10%
6M
9.80%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
34.73%
5Y*
68.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMC vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-11.99%450.89%1.82%42.86%-62.98%-81.18%
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
28.10%23.89%41.25%-11.60%4.42%550.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TMC and ARRNF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.09

Over the past year, TMC and ARRNF have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMC:

$1.75T

ARRNF:

$149.92M

EPS

TMC:

-$0.00

ARRNF:

-A$0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMC:

$0.00

ARRNF:

-A$128.85K

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMC:

-$136.00K

ARRNF:

-A$385.87K

EBITDA (TTM)

TMC:

-$296.72M

ARRNF:

-A$12.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMC vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ARRNF
ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMC vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMCARRNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.22

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.72

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

0.99

-0.65

TMC vs. ARRNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the ARRNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMC and ARRNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMC vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMC drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than ARRNF's maximum drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMC and ARRNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCARRNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.58%

-83.01%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.65%

-69.13%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.56%

-69.13%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.39%

-60.46%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.43%

-46.27%

-33.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.93%

49.90%

-11.97%

Volatility

TMC vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) is 24.27%, while American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a volatility of 26.35%. This indicates that TMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCARRNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.27%

26.35%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.29%

51.26%

+17.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.72%

126.90%

-22.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.21%

314.54%

-201.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.21%

289.79%

-176.58%

Dividends

TMC vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMC nor ARRNF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMC vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TMC the metals company Inc. and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00K-50.00K0.0050.00K100.00K2022202320242025202600
(TMC) Total Revenue
(ARRNF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TMC values in USD, ARRNF values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


TMC and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARRNF has higher volatility (26.35%) compared to TMC (24.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMC dropped -95.58% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.

ARRNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMC and ARRNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer