TMB vs. VGMS
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGMS.
Performance
TMB vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGMS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.68% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and VGMS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGMS
TMB vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMB | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMB vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and VGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -2.46% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.30% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | VGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 3.26% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 3.24% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 3.24% | +0.28% |
TMB vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VGMS's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% |
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.13% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and VGMS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.30% for VGMS.
Find the right allocation for TMB and VGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer