TMB vs. KMLM
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMB is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Thornburg, while KMLM is a Long-Short fund actively managed by CICC. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
TMB vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 12.78%
- 3Y*
- -0.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.34% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | -1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and KMLM is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
KMLM
TMB vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.77 | 0.48 | +5.28 |
Drawdowns
TMB vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -27.47% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -14.42% | +14.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -12.74% | +12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 11.45% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 14.62% | -12.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 14.73% | -12.27% |
TMB vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than KMLM's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.58% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and KMLM have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
TMB is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while KMLM is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for TMB and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer