PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAYX vs. FAHDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAYX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than FAHDX's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAYX has underperformed FAHDX with an annualized return of 4.53%, while FAHDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


TMAYX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.71%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
4.53%

FAHDX

1D
0.38%
1M
2.08%
YTD
7.39%
6M
8.35%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
1.65%6.15%8.27%13.25%-8.54%9.47%4.72%12.39%-2.47%0.31%
FAHDX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A
7.39%11.79%9.26%12.00%-11.37%10.78%8.72%17.39%-5.44%11.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAYX and FAHDX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.57

The correlation between TMAYX and FAHDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAYX vs. FAHDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAYX
TMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FAHDX
FAHDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FAHDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMAYXFAHDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.64

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

5.57

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

23.27

-10.33

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FAHDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAYX and FAHDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMAYXFAHDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.18

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

1.00

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.90

-0.03

Drawdowns

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAYX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum FAHDX drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAYX and FAHDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMAYXFAHDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-48.43%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-3.15%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.36%

-7.00%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.66%

-15.29%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.44%

-28.43%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-5.21%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.75%

-0.27%

Volatility

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) is 0.76%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that TMAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAHDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMAYXFAHDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

1.62%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

4.34%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

5.51%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

6.36%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

7.64%

-2.58%

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FAHDX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAYX vs. FAHDX - Dividend Comparison

TMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than FAHDX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHDX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A
4.11%4.45%3.95%4.47%6.87%4.56%3.47%4.26%5.72%4.66%5.28%4.20%
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
7.72%7.25%7.82%7.91%6.25%6.37%6.43%3.81%2.18%4.47%2.86%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMAYX and FAHDX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAHDX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to TMAYX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAYX dropped -21.44% vs FAHDX's -48.43%.

FAHDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAYX and FAHDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer