TMAT vs. TSXU
TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMAT charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
TMAT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
TMAT
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.89%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- 28.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMAT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 23.07% | -8.44% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and TSXU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
TSXU
TMAT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 4.53 | -4.39 |
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -35.62% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.92% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -10.56% | -21.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | — | — |
Volatility
TMAT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 78.68% | -54.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 78.68% | -48.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 78.68% | -48.06% |
TMAT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.20% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSXU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSXU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.
TMAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. TMAT tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Main Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for TMAT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer