TMAT vs. TSXU
TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMAT charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
TMAT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 113.86% return.
TMAT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 113.86%
- 6M
- 113.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMAT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 18.47% | -7.57% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 113.86% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and TSXU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMAT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -35.62% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -13.54% | +8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | -10.68% | -21.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility
TMAT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.75% | 89.41% | -63.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 89.41% | -58.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 89.41% | -58.67% |
TMAT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TSXU's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.20% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.64% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSXU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSXU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.
TMAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. TMAT tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Main Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for TMAT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer