TMAT vs. SOXX
TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMAT returned 5.97%/yr vs 34.50%/yr for SOXX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMAT charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
TMAT vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return.
TMAT
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.89%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- 28.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
TMAT vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 23.07% | 20.06% | 27.20% | 32.32% | -39.29% | -17.01% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 39.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and SOXX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between TMAT and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMAT vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMAT
SOXX
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TMAT
SOXX
Industrials
TMAT
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
TMAT
SOXX
-
Healthcare
TMAT
SOXX
-
Utilities
TMAT
SOXX
-
Communication Services
TMAT
SOXX
-
Financial Services
TMAT
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TMAT
SOXX
-
Energy
TMAT
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
TMAT
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
TMAT
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
SOXX
TMAT vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.74 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 12.13 | -10.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 46.43 | -41.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 5.61 | -3.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.96 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.45 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -70.21% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -15.77% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.42% | -41.36% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.10% | -45.75% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | 0.00% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -19.97% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 4.11% | +5.10% |
Volatility
TMAT vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) is 7.33%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that TMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 14.03% | -6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 27.35% | -10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 34.18% | -9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 36.11% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 33.43% | -2.81% |
TMAT vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAT vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAT and SOXX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to TMAT (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAT dropped -58.55% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 5-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.50% vs 5.97% for TMAT. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TMAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.50% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.
SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.
TMAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. TMAT tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAT and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer