PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAT vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMAT vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMAT vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
-5.56%20.06%27.20%32.32%-39.29%-17.01%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
17.52%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%32.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 17.52% return.


TMAT

1D
1.85%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
-13.53%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*

FTXL

1D
3.21%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
17.52%
6M
32.85%
1Y
101.16%
3Y*
33.55%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMAT vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMAT vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAT
TMAT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAT vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMATFTXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

2.43

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

2.95

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.50

-3.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

21.31

-17.48

TMAT vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAT and FTXL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMATFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.43

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.52

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.72

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between TMAT and FTXL is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMAT vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FTXL's 0.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.34%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.23%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Drawdowns

TMAT vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and FTXL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMATFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-43.87%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.63%

-18.57%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.61%

-43.87%

-8.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.51%

-6.58%

-10.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-10.72%

-22.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

4.79%

+3.98%

Volatility

TMAT vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) is 8.02%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that TMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMATFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

13.48%

-5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

28.09%

-9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.80%

41.94%

-12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.49%

35.39%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

33.99%

-3.21%