PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAT vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAT vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAT achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


TMAT

1D
-1.03%
1M
14.89%
YTD
23.07%
6M
18.18%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
28.88%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAT vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
23.07%20.06%27.20%32.32%-39.29%-17.01%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%32.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAT and FTXL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021

0.72

The correlation between TMAT and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMAT vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMAT
FTXL

Technology

50.5%
99.5%

Industrials

26.2%
0.5%

Basic Materials

9.1%

-

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Financial Services

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TMAT
50.5%
FTXL
99.5%

Industrials

TMAT
26.2%
FTXL
0.5%

Basic Materials

TMAT
9.1%
FTXL

-

Healthcare

TMAT
8.9%
FTXL

-

Utilities

TMAT
2.5%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

TMAT
2.4%
FTXL

-

Financial Services

TMAT
2.1%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMAT
1.9%
FTXL

-

Energy

TMAT
0.8%
FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

TMAT

-

FTXL

-

Real Estate

TMAT

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAT vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAT
TMAT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAT vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMATFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.78

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

15.62

-13.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

58.28

-53.48

TMAT vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAT and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMATFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

6.33

-4.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.97

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.94

-0.79

Drawdowns

TMAT vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMATFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-43.87%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.63%

-14.51%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.42%

-41.57%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.10%

-43.87%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

0.00%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-10.56%

-21.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

3.88%

+5.33%

Volatility

TMAT vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) is 7.33%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that TMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMATFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

14.28%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

28.98%

-12.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.27%

35.94%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.53%

36.02%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.62%

34.25%

-3.63%

TMAT vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAT vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.34%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMAT and FTXL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to TMAT (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAT dropped -58.55% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 5.97% for TMAT. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TMAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.

TMAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. TMAT tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAT and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer