TMAT vs. DOGG
TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. TMAT is passively managed, while DOGG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMAT returned 20.08%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for DOGG. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMAT charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
TMAT vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TMAT having a 10.76% return and DOGG slightly higher at 11.04%.
TMAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
DOGG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $622.61K | $753.69K | $702.49K | |
| $1.50M | $963.02K | $629.65K |
TMAT vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 10.76% | 20.06% | 27.20% | 24.66% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 11.04% | 19.43% | -2.58% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAT and DOGG is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between TMAT and DOGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAT vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
TMAT
DOGG
TMAT vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMAT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.74 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 5.80 | -4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMAT vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAT drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAT and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -11.19% | -47.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -8.29% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.42% | -11.19% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.87% | -2.39% | -9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.45% | -3.27% | -28.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | 3.91% | +5.78% |
Volatility
TMAT vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 5.00%. This indicates that TMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAT | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 5.00% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 9.40% | +11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 11.50% | +15.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 13.07% | +18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 13.07% | +17.76% |
TMAT vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAT has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAT vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
TMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than DOGG's 8.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.63% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAT and DOGG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMAT has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to DOGG (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAT dropped -58.55% vs DOGG's -11.19%.
On 3-year performance, TMAT leads with 20.08% vs 11.93% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMAT has performed better with a 20.08% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TMAT.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.02% for TMAT.
TMAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Main and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TMAT and 0.75% for DOGG.
DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAT and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer