TLYIX vs. TLLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX).
TLYIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TLLIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | -3.11% | 17.02% | 11.83% | 17.24% | -16.30% | 13.19% | 15.53% | 23.03% | -5.76% | 16.49% |
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | -4.26% | 20.75% | 15.17% | 20.53% | -17.52% | 17.12% | 17.20% | 26.04% | -7.05% | 19.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLYIX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly higher than TLLIX's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TLYIX has underperformed TLLIX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while TLLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.
TLYIX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 12.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
TLLIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLYIX and TLLIX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLYIX vs. TLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLYIX
TLLIX
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLYIX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.58 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 6.02 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLYIX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.69 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLYIX and TLLIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Dividend Comparison
TLYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than TLLIX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | 3.81% | 3.70% | 3.09% | 2.19% | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.03% | 2.26% | 2.73% | 0.15% | 2.56% | 0.27% |
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | 3.26% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 2.25% | 2.67% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLYIX drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, smaller than the maximum TLLIX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLYIX and TLLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLYIX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -31.41% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -10.75% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.24% | -25.38% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.39% | -31.41% | +5.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -8.79% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -4.19% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 2.38% | -0.57% |
Volatility
TLYIX vs. TLLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) is 3.70%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that TLYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLYIX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.68% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 8.51% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 15.13% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 14.37% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 15.46% | -3.02% |