PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTW vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.01% return.


TLTW

1D
0.18%
1M
2.22%
YTD
2.36%
6M
2.13%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.16%
YTD
4.01%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTW vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
2.36%11.36%0.46%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.01%11.71%12.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and IVVW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTW vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTWIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.99

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

15.95

-11.60

TLTW vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTWIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-16.79%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-5.81%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.37%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-1.73%

-6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.09%

+0.99%

Volatility

TLTW vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 1.66%, while iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTWIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

3.45%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

6.91%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

8.05%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

12.69%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.33%

12.69%

-1.36%

TLTW vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTW vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, less than IVVW's 19.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.86%18.55%13.72%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.62%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTW and IVVW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVW has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to TLTW (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 17.28% vs 9.03% for TLTW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TLTW.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.86%, compared with 11.62% for TLTW.

TLTW tracks CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while IVVW tracks Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTW and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer