PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. FIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTW vs. FIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TLTW having a 1.21% return and FIAX slightly higher at 1.22%.


TLTW

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.21%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
10Y*

FIAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTW vs. FIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.21%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-4.11%
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
1.22%2.33%4.67%3.44%-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and FIAX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTW vs. FIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAX
FIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. FIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTWFIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.13

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.67

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.95

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

7.11

-1.83

TLTW vs. FIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and FIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTWFIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.13

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.81

-0.83

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. FIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than FIAX's maximum drawdown of -6.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and FIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTWFIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-6.26%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-2.40%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

-6.26%

-10.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-0.32%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-0.85%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.66%

+1.33%

Volatility

TLTW vs. FIAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) at 1.43%. This indicates that TLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTWFIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.43%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

3.40%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.70%

4.14%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

4.05%

+7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

4.05%

+7.34%

TLTW vs. FIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FIAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTW vs. FIAX - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%, more than FIAX's 8.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
8.19%8.17%8.11%4.81%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.76%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTW and FIAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to FIAX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs FIAX's -6.26%.

On 3-year performance, FIAX leads with 3.47% vs 0.74% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FIAX has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FIAX has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for FIAX.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 8.19% for FIAX.

TLTW is categorized as Options Trading, while FIAX is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 1.04% for FIAX.

TLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTW and FIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer