PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. EOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TLTW vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TLTW vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%
EOCT
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
0.91%22.03%9.66%6.26%-3.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than EOCT's 0.91% return.


TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*

EOCT

1D
1.81%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
0.91%
6M
2.77%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLTW vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TLTW vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EOCT
EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTW vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTWEOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.91

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

2.67

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.04

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.74

12.67

-8.93

TLTW vs. EOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the EOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and EOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTWEOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.91

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.49

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and EOCT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TLTW vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, while EOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%
EOCT
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum EOCT drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and EOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTWEOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-20.35%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-6.57%

+0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-4.23%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-5.88%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.58%

+0.62%

Volatility

TLTW vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 3.46%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TLTWEOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.79%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

6.68%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

10.48%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

11.41%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.55%

11.41%

+0.14%