PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTW vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTW vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return.


TLTW

1D
0.38%
1M
-3.24%
6M
-1.22%
YTD
-1.13%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.93%

DBO

1D
-5.53%
1M
17.71%
6M
53.16%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.34M$10.71M$13.49M
$25.95M$26.72M$32.40M

TLTW vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
-1.13%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.14%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
66.72%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%-10.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTW and DBO is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022

-0.18

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TLTW and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.43, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTW vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTW vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTWDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.86

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

5.64

-4.17

TLTW vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTW Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTW and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTW vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTWDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-90.18%

+71.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-27.73%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-28.20%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-56.13%

+50.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-62.20%

+54.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

9.16%

-6.76%

Volatility

TLTW vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is 2.27%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that TLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTWDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

18.99%

-16.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

34.30%

-28.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

38.86%

-31.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

33.43%

-22.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

32.24%

-20.98%

TLTW vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTW vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.11%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.27%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTW and DBO have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to TLTW (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 12.33% vs 1.02% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.

TLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. TLTW tracks CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTW and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer