TLTP vs. VGSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLTP (Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - TLTP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index while VGSH tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TLTP returned 6.77% vs 3.43% for VGSH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTP charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.

Performance

TLTP vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.48% return.

TLTP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: -0.63%
• 1Y: 6.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGSH

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 1.81%
• 10Y*: 1.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTP vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	0.22%	5.39%	-3.95%
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF	0.48%	5.07%	0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and VGSH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024	0.57

The correlation between TLTP and VGSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLTP vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP

TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 24
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VGSH

VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 83
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTP	VGSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.68	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	4.43	-3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.57	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	3.90	-2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	15.52	-12.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTP vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTP	VGSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.68	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	1.01	-0.92

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and VGSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTP	VGSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-5.70%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-0.88%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-0.29%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-0.60%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	0.22%	+1.90%

Volatility

TLTP vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.35%. This indicates that TLTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTP	VGSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	0.35%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.10%	0.88%	+4.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.62%	1.29%	+6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.84%	1.97%	+7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.84%	1.57%	+8.27%

TLTP vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTP vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than VGSH's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	13.16%	12.53%	2.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF	3.87%	4.00%	4.18%	3.31%	1.15%	0.66%	1.74%	2.28%	1.79%	1.10%	0.84%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTP and VGSH in my portfolio?

TLTP and VGSH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTP or VGSH?

TLTP has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to VGSH (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

Which ETF is better, TLTP or VGSH?

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 6.77% vs 3.43% for VGSH. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTP or VGSH?

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTP or VGSH?

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TLTP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTP or VGSH?

TLTP has the higher dividend yield at 13.16%, compared with 3.87% for VGSH.

What is the main difference between TLTP and VGSH?

TLTP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index, while VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.03% for VGSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.