TLTP vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLTP (Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTP is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index, while LQTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. TLTP is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. Over the past year, TLTP returned 6.77% vs 5.69% for LQTI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTP charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

TLTP vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.

TLTP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: -0.63%
• 1Y: 6.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTP vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	0.22%	3.74%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and LQTI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.75

The correlation between TLTP and LQTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLTP vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP

TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 24
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.12	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.64	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	1.68	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	5.15	-1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTP vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.12	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.88	-0.79

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTP	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-3.41%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-3.41%	-2.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-1.44%	-1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-0.88%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.11%	+1.01%

Volatility

TLTP vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that TLTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTP	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	1.65%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.10%	4.02%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.62%	5.10%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.84%	5.97%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.84%	5.97%	+3.87%

TLTP vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTP vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%	0.00%
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	13.16%	12.53%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTP and LQTI in my portfolio?

TLTP and LQTI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTP or LQTI?

TLTP has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, TLTP or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 6.77% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, TLTP is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTP or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTP or LQTI?

TLTP is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTP or LQTI?

TLTP has the higher dividend yield at 13.16%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between TLTP and LQTI?

TLTP is categorized as Government Bonds, while LQTI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.