PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTI vs. KHPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTI vs. KHPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTI achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than KHPI's 4.44% return.


TLTI

1D
1.22%
1M
3.49%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.06%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KHPI

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
4.44%
6M
3.89%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTI vs. KHPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.05%4.31%-5.46%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
4.44%11.14%-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTI and KHPI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTI vs. KHPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTI
TLTI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTI vs. KHPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTIKHPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.83

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

8.41

-6.28

TLTI vs. KHPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the KHPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTI and KHPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTI vs. KHPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTI drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, smaller than the maximum KHPI drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTI and KHPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTIKHPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-10.58%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-6.55%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-1.45%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-1.23%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.42%

+1.39%

Volatility

TLTI vs. KHPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) is 2.57%, while Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that TLTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KHPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTIKHPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.79%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

5.91%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

7.60%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

9.65%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.13%

9.65%

+1.48%

TLTI vs. KHPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than KHPI's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTI vs. KHPI - Dividend Comparison

TLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than KHPI's 8.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
8.95%8.90%3.01%
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
6.69%6.33%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTI and KHPI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KHPI has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to TLTI (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTI dropped -8.70% vs KHPI's -10.58%.

On 1-year performance, KHPI leads with 11.96% vs 5.98% for TLTI. On fees, TLTI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TLTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KHPI has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for KHPI.

KHPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.95%, compared with 6.69% for TLTI.

They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Kensington Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TLTI and 0.96% for KHPI.

KHPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTI and KHPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer