TLTI vs. IVVW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLTI (NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TLTI is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, TLTI returned 6.68% vs 20.07% for IVVW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLTI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.

Performance

TLTI vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTI achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.84% return.

TLTI

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: -0.98%
• 1Y: 6.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVVW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTI vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTI NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	0.83%	4.31%	-4.61%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.84%	11.71%	-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTI and IVVW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.20

TLTI vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TLTI	IVVW
Technology	35.6%	35.6%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.8%
Communication Services	11.2%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.5%
Industrials	8.3%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

TLTI vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTI

TLTI Risk / Return Rank: 20
TLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 82
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTI vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLTI	IVVW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	2.73	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	3.77	-2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.61	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	3.47	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.47	19.13	-16.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLTI vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTI and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTI	IVVW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	2.73	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	1.07	-1.05

Drawdowns

TLTI vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTI drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTI and IVVW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTI	IVVW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-16.79%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.60%	-5.81%	-0.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-0.09%	-3.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-1.75%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	1.05%	+1.66%

Volatility

TLTI vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that TLTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTI	IVVW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	1.13%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.43%	6.07%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.48%	7.40%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	12.66%	-1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.15%	12.66%	-1.51%

TLTI vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTI vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

TLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than IVVW's 19.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.70%	18.55%	13.72%
TLTI NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	6.31%	6.33%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTI and IVVW in my portfolio?

TLTI and IVVW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTI or IVVW?

TLTI has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTI dropped -8.70% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

Which ETF is better, TLTI or IVVW?

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 20.07% vs 6.68% for TLTI. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTI or IVVW?

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTI or IVVW?

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TLTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTI or IVVW?

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.70%, compared with 6.31% for TLTI.

What is the main difference between TLTI and IVVW?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TLTI and 0.25% for IVVW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.