TLTD vs. WLDR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds - TLTD tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index while WLDR tracks the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTD returned 10.43%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for WLDR. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.

Performance

TLTD vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 29.98% return.

TLTD

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: 5.50%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.13%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 8.38%

WLDR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 3.17%
• 6M: 21.17%
• YTD: 29.98%
• 1Y: 49.01%
• 3Y*: 30.33%
• 5Y*: 18.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt	$470.57K	$675.01K	$784.22K
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	$1.08M	$815.02K	$665.85K

TLTD vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt	11.20%	39.69%	4.78%	17.19%	-13.74%	12.84%	4.21%	21.26%	-20.94%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	29.98%	31.24%	22.74%	18.93%	-10.44%	26.77%	-1.93%	21.54%	-18.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and WLDR is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018	0.72

The correlation between TLTD and WLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLTD vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TLTD	WLDR
Financial Services	25.3%	13.0%
Industrials	17.2%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	7.2%
Basic Materials	9.7%	2.6%
Technology	6.7%	37.8%
Healthcare	6.1%	8.2%
Energy	5.7%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	6.7%
Real Estate	3.6%	1.6%
Communication Services	3.5%	9.1%
Utilities	3.1%	2.5%

Return for Risk

TLTD vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTD

TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 71
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 66

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 94
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTD vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLTD	WLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.80	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.77	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.47	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	5.56	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	19.28	-10.94

TLTD vs. WLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the WLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and WLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and WLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTD	WLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.62%	-44.69%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.11%	-8.86%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.10%	-20.30%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.96%	-23.77%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-2.20%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-8.52%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	2.55%	+0.71%

Volatility

TLTD vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.05%, while Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTD	WLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	6.61%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	14.90%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	17.59%	-2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	17.57%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	21.04%	-4.50%

TLTD vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTD vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than WLDR's 7.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt	3.29%	3.44%	3.88%	3.39%	2.76%	3.44%	2.04%	3.46%	3.16%	2.71%	2.93%	2.56%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	7.16%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTD and WLDR in my portfolio?

TLTD and WLDR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTD or WLDR?

WLDR has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to TLTD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs WLDR's -44.69%.

Which ETF is better, TLTD or WLDR?

On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.04% vs 10.43% for TLTD. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTD or WLDR?

Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTD or WLDR?

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTD or WLDR?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 3.29% for TLTD.

What is the main difference between TLTD and WLDR?

TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Regents Park. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.67% for WLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.