PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TLTD having a 11.20% return and IDMO slightly higher at 11.63%. Over the past 10 years, TLTD has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 9.84%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.


TLTD

1D
0.36%
1M
2.49%
6M
5.50%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
27.13%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
8.38%

IDMO

1D
0.87%
1M
1.71%
6M
6.31%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.90M$20.27M$22.82M
$470.57K$675.01K$784.22K

TLTD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
11.20%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%26.27%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
11.63%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and IDMO is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2012

0.67

The correlation between TLTD and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLTD vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
IDMO

Financial Services

25.3%
11.9%

Industrials

17.2%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

9.7%
4.7%

Technology

6.7%
0.5%

Healthcare

6.1%
0.5%

Energy

5.7%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
0.4%

Real Estate

3.6%
0.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
0.1%

Utilities

3.1%
0.2%

Financial Services

TLTD
25.3%
IDMO
11.9%

Industrials

TLTD
17.2%
IDMO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
10.2%
IDMO
0.0%

Basic Materials

TLTD
9.7%
IDMO
4.7%

Technology

TLTD
6.7%
IDMO
0.5%

Healthcare

TLTD
6.1%
IDMO
0.5%

Energy

TLTD
5.7%
IDMO
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
5.0%
IDMO
0.4%

Real Estate

TLTD
3.6%
IDMO
0.3%

Communication Services

TLTD
3.5%
IDMO
0.1%

Utilities

TLTD
3.1%
IDMO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTDIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.10

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

8.02

+0.33

TLTD vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-39.38%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-12.31%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-12.65%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-27.07%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-31.34%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.95%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-9.68%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.22%

+0.04%

Volatility

TLTD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.05%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

7.16%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

17.53%

-4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

19.24%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

18.24%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

17.97%

-1.43%

TLTD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than IDMO's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.58%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.29%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to TLTD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.61% vs 9.84% for TLTD. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.29% for TLTD.

TLTD is categorized as Global Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.25% for IDMO.

TLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer