TLTD vs. HYGV
TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while HYGV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTD returned 9.51%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for HYGV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for HYGV.
Performance
TLTD vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 1.42% return.
TLTD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
HYGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTD vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 8.45% | 39.69% | 4.78% | 17.19% | -13.74% | 12.84% | 4.21% | 21.26% | -14.20% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.42% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTD and HYGV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TLTD and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
TLTD vs. HYGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTD
HYGV
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
TLTD
HYGV
-
Industrials
TLTD
HYGV
-
Technology
TLTD
HYGV
-
Energy
TLTD
HYGV
Basic Materials
TLTD
HYGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
TLTD
HYGV
-
Healthcare
TLTD
HYGV
-
Consumer Defensive
TLTD
HYGV
-
Utilities
TLTD
HYGV
-
Communication Services
TLTD
HYGV
-
Real Estate
TLTD
HYGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTD vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank
TLTD
HYGV
TLTD vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLTD | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.60 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 11.22 | -2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLTD | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.81 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.46 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
TLTD vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and HYGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTD | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.62% | -23.47% | -17.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -2.68% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | -5.56% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.96% | -17.12% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -0.27% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -3.32% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 0.62% | +2.53% |
Volatility
TLTD vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 1.17%. This indicates that TLTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTD | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 1.17% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 3.02% | +8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 3.85% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 7.59% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 9.20% | +7.61% |
TLTD vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTD vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison
TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than HYGV's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.41% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 3.08% | 3.44% | 3.88% | 3.39% | 2.76% | 3.44% | 2.04% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTD and HYGV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTD has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to HYGV (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs HYGV's -23.47%.
On 5-year performance, TLTD leads with 9.51% vs 3.49% for HYGV. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TLTD has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 3.08% for TLTD.
TLTD is categorized as Global Equities, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.37% for HYGV.
TLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTD and HYGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer