TLTD vs. GVAL
TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. TLTD is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLTD returned 10.09%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for GVAL. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
TLTD vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTD has underperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 10.09%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.
TLTD
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 43.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
TLTD vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 7.09% | 39.69% | 4.78% | 17.19% | -13.74% | 12.84% | 4.21% | 21.26% | -17.57% | 26.27% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 17.40% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTD and GVAL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TLTD and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
TLTD vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTD
GVAL
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
TLTD
GVAL
Industrials
TLTD
GVAL
Basic Materials
TLTD
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
TLTD
GVAL
Technology
TLTD
GVAL
Energy
TLTD
GVAL
Healthcare
TLTD
GVAL
-
Consumer Defensive
TLTD
GVAL
Communication Services
TLTD
GVAL
Real Estate
TLTD
GVAL
Utilities
TLTD
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTD vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TLTD
GVAL
TLTD vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.50 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.81 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 14.52 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTD vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.62% | -46.82% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -11.50% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | -15.72% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.96% | -30.83% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | -46.82% | +6.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -2.31% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -13.82% | +6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.01% | +0.20% |
Volatility
TLTD vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.58%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 6.37% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 13.81% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 15.55% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 18.60% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 19.00% | -2.42% |
TLTD vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTD vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than GVAL's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 3.42% | 3.44% | 3.88% | 3.39% | 2.76% | 3.44% | 2.04% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTD and GVAL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to TLTD (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 11.81% vs 10.09% for TLTD. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.43% for GVAL.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTD and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer