PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLO.TO vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Talon Metals Corp. (TLO.TO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TLO.TO is traded in CAD, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLO.TO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 4.31% return.


TLO.TO

1D
-6.33%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
8.50%
6M
37.05%
1Y
225.50%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
22.58%

GLDM

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.34%
YTD
4.31%
6M
5.19%
1Y
34.13%
3Y*
33.02%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TLO.TO
Talon Metals Corp.
8.50%566.67%-50.00%-63.64%-18.85%19.61%240.00%100.00%-16.67%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
4.31%56.67%38.00%10.55%6.63%-4.88%22.98%12.29%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TLO.TO and GLDM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.11

Over the past year, TLO.TO and GLDM have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLO.TO vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLO.TO
TLO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TLO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TLO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talon Metals Corp. (TLO.TO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLO.TOGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.77

1.99

+4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

4.90

+9.81

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLO.TO and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLO.TOGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.36

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

1.31

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

1.10

-1.13

Drawdowns

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.12%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -22.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLO.TO and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLO.TOGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.12%

-22.74%

-75.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.52%

-17.22%

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.75%

-17.22%

-61.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.18%

-17.36%

-73.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.50%

-15.33%

-60.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.78%

-7.08%

-73.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.41%

6.98%

+8.43%

Volatility

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Talon Metals Corp. (TLO.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.13% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.33%. This indicates that TLO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLO.TOGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.13%

5.33%

+13.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.42%

21.65%

+40.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.64%

25.17%

+72.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.89%

16.78%

+61.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.04%

16.14%

+85.90%

Dividends

TLO.TO vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLO.TO nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TLO.TO and GLDM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLO.TO and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer