PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLMIX vs. TINGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLMIX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than TINGX's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TLMIX has underperformed TINGX with an annualized return of 1.33%, while TINGX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.03% annualized return.


TLMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
1.60%
10Y*
1.33%

TINGX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.68%
6M
11.54%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
7.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLMIX
Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund
1.01%3.74%2.75%3.25%-2.46%-0.05%1.00%2.12%1.26%1.08%
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
10.68%10.63%2.46%18.41%-26.05%-4.22%34.34%26.27%-16.75%34.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TLMIX and TINGX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.04

The correlation between TLMIX and TINGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLMIX vs. TINGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLMIX
TLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TINGX
TINGX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TINGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TINGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLMIXTINGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

0.96

+1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.86

1.44

+4.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.04

1.18

+0.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.17

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.26

3.61

+8.66

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the TINGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLMIX and TINGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLMIXTINGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

0.96

+1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.07

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.41

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.38

+0.72

Drawdowns

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLMIX drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum TINGX drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLMIX and TINGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLMIXTINGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-62.73%

+58.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.00%

-11.83%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.17%

-19.94%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.15%

-43.27%

+39.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.15%

-43.27%

+39.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-2.14%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-13.58%

+13.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

3.82%

-3.54%

Volatility

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) is 0.44%, while Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that TLMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLMIXTINGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

4.07%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.93%

11.58%

-10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21%

14.40%

-13.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.37%

17.04%

-15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.16%

17.09%

-15.93%

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLMIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TINGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLMIX vs. TINGX - Dividend Comparison

TLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than TINGX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
0.97%1.08%8.40%0.58%0.72%6.86%1.17%0.72%4.39%3.60%0.36%0.29%
TLMIX
Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund
3.23%3.25%3.30%2.34%1.15%0.44%1.07%1.45%1.33%0.99%0.47%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLMIX and TINGX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINGX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to TLMIX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLMIX dropped -4.15% vs TINGX's -62.73%.

TLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLMIX and TINGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer