TLLRX vs. FRQKX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TLLRX (Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class) and FRQKX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TLLRX returned 9.99%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for FRQKX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLLRX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FRQKX.

Performance

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class (TLLRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLLRX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than FRQKX's 3.92% return.

TLLRX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

FRQKX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 10.00%
• 3Y*: 7.65%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TLLRX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class	11.44%	20.46%	14.87%	20.25%	-17.73%	16.86%	16.87%	8.83%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.92%	9.91%	4.42%	8.62%	-12.30%	3.95%	9.68%	3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TLLRX and FRQKX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	0.78

The correlation between TLLRX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLLRX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLLRX

TLLRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
TLLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TLLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TLLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
TLLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TLLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FRQKX

FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class (TLLRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLLRX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.40	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.52	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.48	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.91	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.51	12.38	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLLRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLRX and FRQKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLLRX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.40	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.51	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.77	-0.05

Drawdowns

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLLRX drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLRX and FRQKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLLRX	FRQKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.43%	-16.97%	-14.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-3.42%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	-5.17%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-16.97%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.17%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-3.86%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	0.80%	+1.17%

Volatility

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class (TLLRX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 1.65%. This indicates that TLLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLLRX	FRQKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	1.65%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	3.42%	+5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	4.17%	+7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	5.56%	+8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	5.76%	+9.74%

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLLRX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLLRX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

TLLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than FRQKX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.23%	3.09%	2.91%	2.86%	5.12%	6.11%	3.61%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLLRX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund Retirement Class	2.61%	2.91%	2.02%	1.96%	2.11%	2.08%	1.51%	2.04%	2.42%	0.15%	2.41%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLLRX and FRQKX in my portfolio?

TLLRX and FRQKX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLLRX or FRQKX?

TLLRX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to FRQKX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLLRX dropped -31.43% vs FRQKX's -16.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.