PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLLIX vs. TISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLLIX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than TISIX's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX has outperformed TISIX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while TISIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.


TLLIX

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.69%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.83%
1Y
26.44%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
12.09%

TISIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.27%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund
11.23%20.75%15.17%20.53%-17.52%17.12%17.20%26.04%-7.05%19.20%
TISIX
TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund
0.80%5.91%4.59%5.07%-3.32%0.18%3.76%4.43%1.25%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TLLIX and TISIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

-0.04

The correlation between TLLIX and TISIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLLIX vs. TISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLLIX
TLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TISIX
TISIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLLIXTISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.59

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.62

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

14.89

-1.18

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the TISIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLIX and TISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLLIXTISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.24

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

1.40

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.45

-0.71

Drawdowns

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, which is greater than TISIX's maximum drawdown of -5.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and TISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLLIXTISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.41%

-5.31%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-1.17%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-1.17%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.38%

-5.31%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.41%

-5.31%

-26.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.20%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-0.50%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.28%

+1.69%

Volatility

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX) at 0.65%. This indicates that TLLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLLIXTISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

0.65%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

1.38%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

1.86%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

2.04%

+12.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

1.78%

+13.73%

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLLIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TISIX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLLIX vs. TISIX - Dividend Comparison

TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than TISIX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TISIX
TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund
4.35%4.34%3.57%3.18%2.10%1.63%2.14%2.87%2.21%1.87%1.86%1.72%
TLLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund
2.81%3.12%2.26%2.17%2.35%2.29%1.71%2.25%2.67%0.15%2.57%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLLIX and TISIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLLIX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to TISIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLLIX dropped -31.41% vs TISIX's -5.31%.

TLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLLIX and TISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer