PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLH vs. SPTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLH vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's -0.07% return.


TLH

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
0.59%
5Y*
-3.80%
10Y*
-0.83%

SPTB

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLH vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.51%6.47%-0.01%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
-0.07%6.14%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and SPTB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

0.96

The correlation between TLH and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLH vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTB
SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLH vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLHSPTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.34

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

3.98

-1.70

TLH vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SPTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLH and SPTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLHSPTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.07

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.92

-0.64

Drawdowns

TLH vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and SPTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLHSPTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-4.96%

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-2.90%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.82%

-1.94%

-27.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-1.32%

-9.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

0.98%

+1.37%

Volatility

TLH vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison

iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) at 1.11%. This indicates that TLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLHSPTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.11%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

2.47%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

3.64%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

4.42%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

4.42%

+6.77%

TLH vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLH vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
4.20%4.23%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.48%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TLH and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLH has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to SPTB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLH dropped -41.14% vs SPTB's -4.96%.

On 1-year performance, TLH leads with 5.33% vs 3.87% for SPTB. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLH has performed better with a 5.33% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLH.

TLH has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.

TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.03% for SPTB.

SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLH and SPTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer