TLH vs. IBTE
TLH (iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - TLH tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. TLH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.
Performance
TLH vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -3.80%
- 10Y*
- -0.83%
IBTE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLH vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.09% |
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLH vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank
TLH
IBTE
TLH vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLH | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLH | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TLH vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and IBTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLH | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | 0.00% | -41.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.82% | 0.00% | -29.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | 0.00% | -10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
TLH vs. IBTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLH | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.01% | 0.00% | +8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 0.00% | +12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 0.00% | +11.19% |
TLH vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLH vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison
TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLH.
TLH has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.
TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.07% for IBTE.
Find the right allocation for TLH and IBTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer