PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLH vs. DTLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TLH is traded in USD, while DTLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DTLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than DTLE.L's -3.38% return.


TLH

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
0.59%
5Y*
-3.80%
10Y*
-0.83%

DTLE.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-3.38%
6M
-3.26%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
-1.29%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.51%6.47%-4.21%4.03%-25.24%-5.38%13.78%10.11%0.37%-0.79%
DTLE.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
-3.38%15.98%-14.67%2.57%-36.47%-11.73%25.40%10.10%-8.92%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and DTLE.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.66

The correlation between TLH and DTLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLH vs. DTLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLE.L
DTLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DTLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLHDTLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.46

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

1.19

+1.08

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the DTLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLH and DTLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLHDTLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.34

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.50

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.23

+0.50

Drawdowns

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum DTLE.L drawdown of -56.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and DTLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLHDTLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-56.35%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-9.78%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-22.61%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-50.59%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.82%

-48.02%

+18.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-27.81%

+17.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.78%

-1.43%

Volatility

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) is 2.46%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that TLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLHDTLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

4.29%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

8.96%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

13.20%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

17.93%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

17.88%

-6.69%

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLE.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLH vs. DTLE.L - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than DTLE.L's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTLE.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
4.27%4.18%4.75%3.75%3.05%1.76%1.69%2.50%2.88%0.51%0.00%0.00%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.48%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLH and DTLE.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLH.

TLH is categorized as Government Bonds, while DTLE.L is Long-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.10% for DTLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLH and DTLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer