PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and BPRF.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Brompton, while BPRF.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLF.TO returned 17.07%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for BPRF.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than BPRF.TO's 0.58% return.

TLF.TO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.87%
6M
25.65%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
38.85%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
21.83%

BPRF.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.31%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.58%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		27.21%18.20%21.45%49.36%-30.09%31.51%38.89%37.12%-4.76%
BPRF.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF		0.58%4.85%11.66%6.76%-13.36%3.72%5.32%16.17%-4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TLF.TO and BPRF.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.28

The correlation between TLF.TO and BPRF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF

Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF

Return for Risk

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLF.TO
TLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO
BPRF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TLF.TOBPRF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
0.69

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.04
1.03

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.21

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

3.96

+5.24

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the BPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLF.TO and BPRF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, roughly equal to the maximum BPRF.TO drawdown of -35.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and BPRF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLF.TOBPRF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-35.50%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-3.17%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.99%

-4.71%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-21.70%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-1.63%

-5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-6.58%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

0.97%

+3.27%

Volatility

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.38% compared to Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) at 2.00%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPRF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLF.TOBPRF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.38%

2.00%

+11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

4.20%

+17.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

5.57%

+18.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

9.59%

+16.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

13.74%

+10.46%

Dividends

TLF.TO vs. BPRF.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than BPRF.TO's 5.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRF.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF		5.91%5.78%5.72%6.02%5.71%4.69%4.65%4.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		5.41%5.90%5.86%5.31%6.97%3.40%3.49%4.64%6.05%5.94%7.67%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

TLF.TO and BPRF.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLF.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPRF.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and BPRF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer