TLDTX vs. TRBCX
TLDTX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TLDTX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, TLDTX returned 1.79%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for TRBCX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLDTX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.
Performance
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLDTX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -1.78% return.
TLDTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- —
TRBCX
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDTX T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund | 0.93% | 6.32% | 1.16% | 3.23% | -4.84% | 5.08% | 1.50% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -1.78% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDTX and TRBCX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDTX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
TLDTX
TRBCX
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLDTX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.77 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 2.52 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDTX drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDTX and TRBCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDTX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -54.56% | +47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -17.01% | +13.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.50% | -23.08% | +18.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.24% | -43.63% | +36.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -7.52% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -11.29% | +9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 5.16% | -3.44% |
Volatility
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) is 0.88%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that TLDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDTX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 6.71% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 14.55% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 17.70% | -12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 24.17% | -19.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 22.84% | -18.37% |
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDTX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLDTX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
TLDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than TRBCX's 5.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDTX T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.51% | 4.66% | 1.63% | 4.09% | 6.45% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.34% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDTX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRBCX has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to TLDTX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDTX dropped -7.24% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.
TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLDTX and TRBCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer