TLDR vs. TBLL
TLDR (The Laddered T-Bill ETF) and TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. TLDR is actively managed, while TBLL is passively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TLDR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TBLL.
Performance
TLDR vs. TBLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLDR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.65M | $26.87M | $30.74M | |
| $4.55M | $2.20M | $886.93K |
TLDR vs. TBLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.82% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDR and TBLL is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDR vs. TBLL — Risk / Return Rank
TLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBLL
TLDR vs. TBLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLDR | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 45.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 204.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,995.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLDR vs. TBLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.06%, smaller than the maximum TBLL drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and TBLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDR | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.63% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.13% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
TLDR vs. TBLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDR | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42% | 0.20% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 0.45% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 0.56% | -0.14% |
TLDR vs. TBLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLDR vs. TBLL - Dividend Comparison
TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than TBLL's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.69% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% |
TLDR The Laddered T-Bill ETF | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDR and TBLL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TLDR.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.76% for TLDR.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 0.08% for TBLL.
Find the right allocation for TLDR and TBLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer