PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDR vs. CWII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDR vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLDR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLDR vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLDR and CWII is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDR vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLDR vs. CWII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLDRCWIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.82

-0.38

+9.19

Drawdowns

TLDR vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.05%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDR and CWII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDRCWIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-48.46%

+48.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.63%

+20.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-30.55%

+30.54%

Volatility

TLDR vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDRCWIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39%

88.61%

-88.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

88.61%

-88.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

88.61%

-88.22%

TLDR vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDR vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

TLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than CWII's 20.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
20.73%6.09%
TLDR
The Laddered T-Bill ETF
1.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLDR and CWII have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 1.22% for TLDR.

TLDR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CWII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TLDR and 1.03% for CWII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDR and CWII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer