PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDIX vs. SMBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, TLDIX has outperformed SMBPX with an annualized return of 2.81%, while SMBPX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.30% annualized return.


TLDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.61%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
2.81%
ALL TIME*
2.53%

SMBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
1.70%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
-0.30%
ALL TIME*
2.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLDIX
Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund
1.91%4.84%5.81%4.92%0.00%0.32%3.26%3.87%1.90%1.39%
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.00%2.92%-0.11%1.84%-2.57%-1.39%0.77%1.00%-2.38%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TLDIX and SMBPX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.22

The correlation between TLDIX and SMBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDIX vs. SMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLDIX
TLDIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TLDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TLDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBPX
SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLDIXSMBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.05

2.11

+2.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.41

5.01

+12.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

84.28

10.98

+73.31

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the SMBPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLDIX and SMBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDIX drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum SMBPX drawdown of -9.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDIX and SMBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDIXSMBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-9.99%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.56%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

-4.48%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.39%

-6.31%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.43%

-9.63%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.99%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-2.47%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.30%

-0.25%

Volatility

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) has a higher volatility of 0.14% compared to Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) at 0.00%. This indicates that TLDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDIXSMBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

0.00%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.53%

0.24%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

1.31%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.31%

2.21%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.26%

1.94%

-0.68%

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than SMBPX's 3.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDIX vs. SMBPX - Dividend Comparison

TLDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than SMBPX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.69%2.69%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.10%0.10%0.36%0.23%4.23%1.50%
TLDIX
Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund
4.02%4.89%5.64%4.12%2.12%1.53%2.32%2.82%2.37%1.62%1.24%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLDIX and SMBPX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLDIX has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDIX dropped -3.43% vs SMBPX's -9.99%.

TLDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDIX and SMBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer