PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDIX vs. LTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLDIX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than LTMFX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TLDIX has outperformed LTMFX with an annualized return of 2.80%, while LTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


TLDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.80%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
2.80%

LTMFX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLDIX
Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund
1.42%4.84%5.81%4.92%-0.00%0.32%3.26%3.87%1.90%1.39%
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
0.82%5.74%1.84%3.83%-5.27%-0.18%2.97%3.81%1.00%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TLDIX and LTMFX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.37

The correlation between TLDIX and LTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDIX vs. LTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLDIX
TLDIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TLDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TLDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LTMFX
LTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLDIXLTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.43

1.88

+3.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.12

2.23

+14.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

83.37

7.01

+76.37

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is comparable to the LTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLDIX and LTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLDIXLTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

2.75

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.61

0.55

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.23

0.64

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

0.84

+1.25

Drawdowns

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDIX drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum LTMFX drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDIX and LTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDIXLTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-8.40%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-1.96%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

-2.95%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.39%

-8.40%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.43%

-8.40%

+4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.81%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-1.64%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.62%

-0.57%

Volatility

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) is 0.14%, while Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that TLDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDIXLTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

0.63%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.62%

1.28%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

1.59%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.31%

2.35%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.26%

2.27%

-1.01%

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than LTMFX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLDIX vs. LTMFX - Dividend Comparison

TLDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than LTMFX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
3.23%4.28%3.60%2.11%1.62%1.27%1.54%1.78%1.83%1.64%1.57%1.56%
TLDIX
Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund
4.44%4.89%5.64%4.12%2.12%1.53%2.32%2.82%2.37%1.62%1.24%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLDIX and LTMFX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTMFX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to TLDIX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDIX dropped -3.43% vs LTMFX's -8.40%.

TLDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDIX and LTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer